I mean, what are the business requirements that would lead someone to need to distribute the framework?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:08 PM, whatabrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When it's linked dynamically. There's an option to build the > framework into something like "framework_3.0.0.477.swf." > > > --- In [email protected], "Howard Fore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Maybe I'm missing something but what kind of scenario would require > > redistributing the framework? > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:01 PM, whatabrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If this is covered under the SDK licence, then distributing the > > > framework gives Adobe the right to audit us. If that's the case, > we > > > may have to stop using Flex altogether. > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Matt Chotin <mchotin@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm not not sure why you say the SDK license doesn't apply. It > > > does apply (unless you mean because we've indicated the piece > falls > > > under the MPL). But it is expected that you may distribute the > > > framework_3.0.0.477.swf as an RSL as part of your program. > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > Adobe, Flex Product Manager > > > > Consider yourself legally approved for that file > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/14/08 8:28 AM, "whatabrain" <junk1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm using dynamic linking, and distributing > framework_3.0.0.477.swf > > > > with my web control. My company has been desperately searching > > > around > > > > for a licence for this file, but can't find one. In fact, they > can't > > > > even find a licence for the statically-linked version. I know it > > > sounds > > > > silly, but some companies require these things. That's why > Visual > > > > Studio comes with a licence that says "anything you compile is > > > owned by > > > > you." > > > > > > > > We've looked at the SDK licence, which doesn't seem to apply. It > > > puts > > > > incredibly harsh restrictions and liability on you if you > distribute > > > > any component of the SDK (for example, Adobe can audit your > > > software at > > > > any time), but framework_3.0.0.477.swf is not included in the > SDK. > > > > > > > > When we called Adobe, we effectively got the answer: "That's a > > > stupid > > > > question. Of course you can distribute programs that you > write," but > > > > for a company worried about this kind of thing, that's not a > useful > > > > answer. > > > > > > > > So can anyone help me out? Is there a licence somewhere for this > > > kind > > > > of thing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > > FAQ: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > > Alternative FAQ location: > > > https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=942dbdc8-e469- > 446f-b4cf-1e62079f6847<https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=942dbdc8-e469-446f-b4cf-1e62079f6847> > > > Search Archives: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! > Groups > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "The universe tends toward maximum irony. Don't push it." - Jeff > Atwood > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Alternative FAQ location: > https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=942dbdc8-e469-446f-b4cf-1e62079f6847 > Search Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups > Links > > > > -- Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The universe tends toward maximum irony. Don't push it." - Jeff Atwood
