I have seen that some people have expressed that since Net Bean is
   free, it will eventually attract more developers than Flex. There are so
   many JAVA developers out there and I guess when they will come
   across to pick a RIA technology may be they will pick JavaFX.

   By the way got some interesting articles:

   http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/javaone_2007_james_ward.html
   
http://www.hiveminds.co.uk/content/flex-3-vs-silverlight-and-javafx-is-adobe-listening.html
   http://www.insideria.com/2008/02/hello-flex-silverlight-and-jav.html



On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Josh McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for that info Chet, you're definitely in a unique position to offer
> insight.
>
> Would I be right in saying that compared with FX Script (ie, without writing
> Java2D / Swing code), AS3, Degrafa/FXG and MXML provide a lot more power in
> terms of custom component and skin creation? This is the way it seems, but
> that could be completely the fault of Sun bungling their PR as usual ;-)
>
> I'm also interested in the differences and similarities between JFX's
> bindings and those supported in Flex if you can find the time to elaborate
> on the subject.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Josh
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Chet Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I would be curious to find out how others view the platforms, especially
>> from the standpoint of external application developers, but having been on
>> the inside of both of these projects, here are some points of comparison.
>> I'm attempting to be objective here and just point out some of the areas to
>> consider. But since I used to work at Sun on Java/JavaFX and now work on the
>> Flex team at Adobe you should filter appropriately.
>>
>>
>>
>> -          Maturity: One of the reasons that you haven't heard much about
>> JavaFX to date is that it's actually not yet released. Supposedly this will
>> happen in the very near future, so maybe we'll all hear more about it at
>> that time.
>>
>> -          Language: Although many of the underlying capabilities of
>> JavaFX  rely on the Java SE platform, JavaFX itself is based on a new
>> scripting language (not Java, not JavaScript, not ActionScript, but a new
>> scripting language entirely). One notable differences between the languages
>> of JavaFX and Flex is that Flex uses MXML for its declarative aspects, and
>> ActionScript for the programmatic aspects. The JavaFX language combines both
>> of these elements, having aspects of declarative and programmatic in the
>> same code.
>>
>> -          GUI capabilities: Both platforms offer GUI components,
>> graphics, animation, and databinding capabilities, thought the platforms
>> differ widely in syntax and capabilities of these different features.
>>
>> -          Tooling: Most of the tooling so far announced for JavaFX are
>> more on the code developer side; editing plugins for NetBeans, plus export
>> plugins for Illustrator and Photoshop (they produce PNG files from the
>> layers in the project). On the Flex side, there's the FlexBuilder IDE and
>> the in-development tools such as Flash Catalyst for designer/developer
>> workflows and FXG roundtrip import/export from/to the CS tools including
>> Catalys for the graphics tags in the Gumbo release of the SDK.
>>
>> -          Runtime availability: The availability of the JavaFX runtime is
>> basically that of the Java platform (if a user's machine does not have the
>> proper release of Java (I believe it will require the latest updated 10
>> release), they will need to download/install it). The availability of Flex
>> is basically that of the Flash platform of the appropriate version (e.g.,
>> Gumbo will run on FlashPlayer 10).
>>
>>
>>
>> Chet.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of hworke
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 8:19 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [flexcoders] JavaFX and Flex how do we compare?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi I just read the following news where I found that
>> SUN is also coming up with their RIA technology and
>> it says that it will take on AJAX and Silverlight.
>> It will also have desktop runtime like AIR, I guess!!!
>> SUN was also in MAX, San Francisco and there they also
>> talked about it. Now I want to know how do we compare
>> JavaFX and Flex?
>>
>> http://tech.yahoo.com/news/infoworld/20081118/tc_infoworld/117780
>>
>> http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/05/07/javafx-javaone_1.html
>
>
> --
> "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee."
>
> Like the cut of my jib? Check out my Flex blog!
>
> :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
> :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> :: http://flex.joshmcdonald.info/
> :: http://twitter.com/sophistifunk
> 

Reply via email to