Flex is more interactive? This must be a misunderstanding. Flex is really more about enterprise development process, less about technology. And it is not concerned about size, just features. Your 500k Flex widget is 20k in Flash probably.
Ralf. On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: > It's all Flash, why is there any notion of Flash vs. Flex. It's like saying > 'Should we use PHP or Zend?'. Rather it should be 'Do we need Flex in our > Flash app?' Unless you > > Flex as newer? Flex came out 5 years ago. ActionScript 3 was publicly > released in June 2006. Although Flex is now AS3, still the notion that Flex > is 'newer' doesn't make any sense to me. > It's all Flash.... and soon Flex will have a new name so..... > > On Dec 18, 2008, at 3:27 PM, devenhariyani wrote: > > This restricts us to Flash or Flex. Flex being the > newer technology it made sense to try flex, especially for our plans > to have more interactive widgets in the future. > >
