On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Amy <[email protected]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Tracy Spratt" <tspr...@...> wrote: >> >> A quick google indicates that, as Manish says, current thinking is > to >> use timer for this type of work. > > I'm not sure I agree with this, since a timer can't react before the > next frame anyway (i.e. the most accurate a timer can be is the frame > rate).
Agreed. The benefit of a timer-based thing is that you can slow it down further. -- manishjethani.com
