--- In [email protected], "Manish Jethani" <manish.jeth...@...> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Amy <amyblankens...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Tracy Spratt" <tspratt@> wrote: > >> > >> A quick google indicates that, as Manish says, current thinking is > > to > >> use timer for this type of work. > > > > I'm not sure I agree with this, since a timer can't react before the > > next frame anyway (i.e. the most accurate a timer can be is the frame > > rate). > > Agreed. The benefit of a timer-based thing is that you can slow it down further.
To every other frame or every thidr frame or... ;-) Of course, you can change the frame rate to get a timer that's accurate to the timing you want. -Amy > > -- > manishjethani.com >
