No, the joystick is like moving the mouse without any button down.

 

I am currently listening to systemManager, I'll try stage to see if the
behavior is any different.

 

Tracy Spratt,

Lariat Services, development services available

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Alex Harui
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 6:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] AIR app, need MouseMove events NOT bounded by
screen

 

  

Is the mouse button down?  If so, you should still get mouseMove from the
stage.

 

Alex Harui

Flex SDK Developer

Adobe Systems Inc. <http://www.adobe.com/> 

Blog: http://blogs. <http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui> adobe.com/aharui

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Tracy Spratt
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [flexcoders] AIR app, need MouseMove events NOT bounded by screen

 

  

This AIR app is to be embedded in a consumer electronics product. It is a
transparent UI that indirectly controls an underlying map application by
sending messages via sockets.

The product actually has a joystick and not a mouse and one requirement is
that moving the joystick will cause the map to pan. 

In development, using a real mouse, when the mouse pointer hits a screen
boundary, MouseMove events are no longer dispatched in that direction. In a
corner, all events cease. This is causing me problems with continuing to
send messages to the application to continue panning.

I am hoping the joystick will behave differently, but am also looking for
any other suggestions. I have considered using a timer to send repeated
increments (the back-end app only needs position deltas), but I haven't
figured out how to stop that.

As far as I can tell, there is no way to set the position of the system
cursor. If I could reset the mouse x,y to some positive values when it
approached an edge, that would work as well.

Is there anyway I can get "deeper" into the mouse event? If I could get a
generic "moving" event, that would also suffice.

Any thoughts?

Tracy Spratt



Reply via email to