I'm also ending up with my own MVC thing... but as a result of mis-interpreting and incorrectly implementing Cairngorm rather than consciously deciding to do so :)
Thanks for the help! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Muzak Sent: 07 August 2009 11:12 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model? I don't have a ModelLocator, just one or more Models :) but yes, that's what goes in the "model" package. I have my own MVC framework, based on Cairngorm and ARP. ARP is what I started out with in AS2 (Flash) and Cairngorm is what most people moved over to when AS3 and/or Flex 2 came out. As already mentioned, I find Cairngorm has a few things backwards, so I threw together my own MVC thing. regards, Muzak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jorge Maiquez" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:21 AM Subject: RE: [flexcoders] cairngorm convention: vo or model? >> bindable, typed data object (which may or may not get sent across the wire). > > Cool, that definition would take care of all 3 points I originally mentioned. > > So, what do you actually put into the model package? Is it just the > ModelLocator? > > cheers, > -Jorge > ------------------------------------ -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Alternative FAQ location: https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=942dbdc8-e469-446f-b4cf-1e62079f6847 Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
