Actually, no. It would interpret it as null if it were enclosed in curly braces
like this:
var xml:XML = <outer><inner>{null}</inner></outer>;
And even then, null might be converted to its String value, "null", as
the content of the element. I'd have to try it to know for sure.
In the example I gave, the content of the element is a String consisting of the
letters "n", "u", "l" and "l", in that order.
In any case, the xmlList variable would reference a non-null XMLList object.
That's easily proven by dereferencing it:
trace("The length is " + xmlList.length());
That would output "The length is 1".
--- On Thu, 8/13/09, Tracy Spratt <tr...@nts3rd.com> wrote:
From: Tracy Spratt <tr...@nts3rd.com>
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: *** So you think you know ActionScript? (Read
original post first) ***
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 3:49 PM
Ah, I see something I missed at
first. This example is using “literal” xml, so the null IS
getting interpreted by AS as null and not as a string. I bet it would be
different if you did:
var xml:XML = XML(“<outer><inner> null</inner> </outer>”);
Even so I am still surprised because the
null should be the text node and the expression should return an XMLList with
zero length. Very interesting.
Tracy Spratt,
Lariat Services, development services
available
From:
flexcod...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:flexcoders@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
jaywood58
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009
12:48 PM
To: flexcod...@yahoogro ups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: *** So
you think you know ActionScript? (Read original post first) ***
--- In flexcod...@yahoogro ups.com,
"Tracy Spratt" < tracy @...>
wrote:
>
> _____
>
> From: flexcod...@yahoogro ups.com
[mailto:flexcod...@yahoogro ups.com]
On
> Behalf Of Paul Andrews
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:33 PM
> To: flexcod...@yahoogro ups.com
> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] *** So you think you know ActionScript? (Read
> original post first) ***
>
>
>
>
>
> Dave Glasser wrote:
> > Consider this code snippet:
> >
> > var xml:XML = <outer><inner> null</inner> </outer>;
> > var xmlList:XMLList = xml.inner;
> > trace(xmlList == null);
> >
> > What does the trace statement output, true or false, and why?
> >
> > Please provide an answer without running the code (of course) and,
better
> yet, without consulting any documentation, or any of the other answers
that
> may have been posted already (if you read the list in chronological
order.)
> Pretend it's a job interview question and you have to give it your best
shot
> off the top of your head.
> >
> > And also, if you don't mind, don't top-post your answer, so that if
> someone does read your answer before the original post, they might get a
> chance to answer without having seen yours first.
> >
>
> xmlList is set to point at somthing which isn't a list, so I think the
> trace statement will not be reached. That's my 02:31AM thought..
>
>
>
> All e4x expressions return an XMLList. It can be empty but is never a
null.
> Besides, the characters. "null" in a text node are just a
string. "null" in
> an AS comparison is a special value. The trace will display false.
> Trace("xmllist. text() =="null" ); //would return true.
>
>
>
> Tracy Spratt,
>
> Lariat Services, development services available
>
Like Tracy , I
thought it would return false, for the same reason -- that <inner>null< /inner>
would be interpreted as a string. Was surprised when I ran the code and saw
true. What's going on? It seems like the AS decoder recognizes "null"
as a special case.
