I've only ever used ObjectProxy in spikes as a replacement for real objects which weren't available, never in a production app.
My impression of them was they were quite slow (as with all dynamic classes), but YMMV... Gk. Gregor Kiddie Senior Developer INPS Tel: 01382 564343 Registered address: The Bread Factory, 1a Broughton Street, London SW8 3QJ Registered Number: 1788577 Registered in the UK Visit our Internet Web site at www.inps.co.uk <blocked::http://www.inps.co.uk/> The information in this internet email is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it by anyone else is not authorised. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of INPS or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient please contact is.helpd...@inps.co.uk ________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Battershall, Jeff Sent: 27 October 2009 14:34 To: 'flexcoders@yahoogroups.com' Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Binding & Model Objects Thanks Gregor, I think I'm starting to get it. - by having client-side bindable objects, using custom events, that are generated from DTOs, you minimize the amount of generic change events being fired. What about ObjectProxy? Can't similar results be obtained there? (http://blogs.digitalprimates.net/codeSlinger/index.cfm/2007/8/20/Making -the-unbindable-bindable-with-Object-Proxy). Jeff
