I don't use HTTPS here (We have a closed intranet) so I can't test if it would 
work but as I understand it, you should be able to do an HTTP call from the SWF.

I suggest giving it a try and monitoring the exchange with something like 
Charles. That should tell you pretty quickly whether you can even do it.

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Laurence" <lmacne...@...> wrote:
>
> So, you're saying that serving the .SWF via HTTPS won't automatically make 
> all my ColdFusion calls through HTTPS?  Like, I can have the majority of my 
> calls through HTTP, and just secure the couple of calls that need to be 
> secured?
> 
> I thought if you served the .SWF via HTTPS, all the calls to CF were 
> automatically sent through HTTPS?
> 
> L.
> 
> 
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "valdhor" <valdhorlists@> wrote:
> >
> > An Idea...
> > 
> > Put the SWF on the HTTPS Server. There will be a one time hit as the user 
> > loads the SWF. Place your secure calls to the same HTTPS server. Place the 
> > other calls to an HTTP server.
> > 
> > I don't know how or even if that would work but it's worth a try.
> > 
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Laurence" <LMacNeill@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes but HTTPS is *so* much slower than HTTP...  Some of the data that we 
> > > don't need secured can get as high as 50,000 records...  I only need one 
> > > credit-card number per account secured.  Not much data at all...
> > > 
> > > So how, exactly, does setting the secure="false" tag open it up to 
> > > snooping or spoofing?  I still don't really get that...  I mean, it's 
> > > still using HTTPS over the secure ColdFusion channel I created, right?  
> > > Wouldn't that still be secure?
> > > 
> > > And if setting the secure="false" tag removes all HTTPS security, then 
> > > why bother offering the ability to create secure channels in ColdFusion?  
> > > I mean, if you're serving the .SWF over HTTPS, then all channels are 
> > > automatically secure, yes?  So the only point of having a separate secure 
> > > channel is to do exactly what I'm trying to do...  Why offer that, if 
> > > it's not truly secure?  I'm still confused...
> > > 
> > > L.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "valdhor" <valdhorlists@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > From the Adobe Help files:
> > > > ======================================================================
> > > > Each <allow-access-from> tag also has the optional secure attribute, 
> > > > which defaults to true. You can set the attribute to false if your 
> > > > policy file is on an HTTPS server, and you want to allow SWF files on a 
> > > > non-HTTPS server to load data from the HTTPS server.
> > > > 
> > > > Setting the secure attribute to false could compromise the security 
> > > > offered by HTTPS. In particular, setting this attribute to false opens 
> > > > secure content to snooping and spoofing attacks. Adobe strongly 
> > > > recommends that you not set the secure attribute to false.
> > > > 
> > > > If data to be loaded is on a HTTPS server, but the SWF file loading it 
> > > > is on an HTTP server, Adobe recommends that you move the loading SWF 
> > > > file to an HTTPS server so that you can keep all copies of your secure 
> > > > data under the protection of HTTPS.
> > > > ======================================================================
> > > > 
> > > > If I needed secure access, I would move everything over to https.
> > > > 
> > > > The only other thing I could suggest is to use encryption. Check out 
> > > > AS3Crypto (http://code.google.com/p/as3crypto/). Of course, if you 
> > > > serve the SWF over HTTP, someone could analyze the SWF and find the 
> > > > encryption key. Again, for security reasons, I would move everything 
> > > > over to https.
> > > > 
> > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Laurence" <LMacNeill@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > So, here's my crossdomain.xml in its final form:
> > > > > 
> > > > > <cross-domain-policy>
> > > > >       <site-control permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only" />
> > > > > 
> > > > >       <allow-http-request-headers-from domain="www.mydomain.com" 
> > > > > headers="*" secure="false"/>
> > > > >       <allow-access-from domain="www.mydomain.com" secure="false" />
> > > > > 
> > > > > </cross-domain-policy>
> > > > > 
> > > > > This allows all the stuff on the SecureColdFusion channel I created 
> > > > > to work just fine, as long as I access the site from "mydomain.com" 
> > > > > and not from "localhost" or "myserver01" (its NetBIOS name).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Even if I put <allow-access-from domain="localhost"/> (or 
> > > > > domain="myserver01"/>) in there, it still won't allow access from 
> > > > > localhost (or myserver01), because the security certificate is issued 
> > > > > to mydomain.com -- the names don't match, so the browser/Flash/CF 
> > > > > rejects it.  (I don't know exactly which one is rejecting it, but 
> > > > > somewhere along the line it's being rejected because of the 
> > > > > name-mismatch.)
> > > > > 
> > > > > The only way that I can see to change that behavior is to create two 
> > > > > more virtual websites that point to the same location, and give each 
> > > > > of those virtual sites their own certificate (one assigned to 
> > > > > "myserver01" and one assigned to "localhost".  Otherwise, I can't 
> > > > > access the app on my local server if the Internet goes down.  Yuck.  
> > > > > (If anyone knows a better way, I'm all ears.)
> > > > > 
> > > > > The one thing that still bothers me about this setup is the 
> > > > > 'secure="false"' tags.  I cannot get a straight answer as to exactly 
> > > > > what this does to my security.  It enables http .SWFs to access https 
> > > > > data, sure.  But does that mean it's disabling all https when it does 
> > > > > that?  Or does it mean that it is secure during transit over the 
> > > > > Internet, but not when it's being held in the Flex app?  Or does it 
> > > > > mean something entirely different?  There is no site that has a 
> > > > > direct answer to this -- they all just say "it's not recommended due 
> > > > > to security issues," or something along those lines.  But they don't 
> > > > > specify WHAT security issues there are.  I need to know -- I can't 
> > > > > serve my entire app over an https connection because it'll be too 
> > > > > slow, but I must have secure access to some of the data...
> > > > > 
> > > > > So if anyone can answer the 'secure="false"' question specifically, I 
> > > > > would be very grateful.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > L.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to