You could probably try having a base VO for all the properties that you know
will be there and include a single property in the VO which would be either
a Dictionary or a generic object used as an associative array to handle all
your custom properties.  Then just populate the VO like you normally would
and when it comes to extra properties, throw them in that one extra VO
property.  You'd have to have some kind of parsing method on both ends but
I'd think this would work without too much trouble.

-Jake

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Laurence <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> We're using an SQL database with a ColdFusion "intermediary" between the
> Flex app and the database... I've used XML files to configure a couple of
> the components -- give the user the option to change the layout of a
> component, for example, by modifying the contents of a config.xml file, that
> sort of thing... But I don't see us replacing our database with a bunch of
> XML files... (Or maybe I completely misunderstood your reply, which is quite
> possible...)
>
> I was hoping that there might be a way to get the program to modify its VOs
> by reading from an XML file what fields I want the VO to store... But
> honestly, I don't care where that info is stored... I just need to figure
> out how to dynamically modify a VO (and have ColdFusion realize that the VO
> has been changed by the Flex app) so I can deal with databases that have had
> fields added or changed without having to re-compile the entire program
> every time... And then, of course, how to reference these
> dynamically-modified VOs in my program.
>
> Thanks,
> L.
>
> --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, Nick
> Middleweek <n...@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Laurence,
> >
> > I'm pretty new to Flex so there might be reasons to stick with Value
> Objects
> > that I'm unaware of but you can definitely read and write XML and
> generate
> > forms, layouts, etc on the fly based on the XML contents. I've used E4X
> to
> > query XML data that I've sucked in from an HTTP call, modified the XML
> using
> > E4X and pinged it back up to the HTTP server to save the XML data for
> later
> > use.
> >
> > Hope that helps...
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Nick
> > --
> > http://blog.middleweek.co.uk/
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2 March 2010 19:19, Laurence <lmacne...@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > The program that I'm working on is for a company that does
> registrations
> > > for conventions and trade-shows. Different clients want different
> > > information stored for each show. Most of the information is the same
> from
> > > show-to-show, but every show has certain customizations that need to be
> > > done.
> > >
> > > The way they're doing it now is by going into the source code of their
> > > program and modifying it that way. We could do the same thing with our
> Flex
> > > app, but I'm trying like heck to avoid that...
> > >
> > > The problem I'm running into is the Flex Value Objects -- they pretty
> much
> > > have to be compiled into the .SWF file, which means we're stuck
> modifying
> > > source-code and re-compiling for each individual show. Not the solution
> we
> > > want.
> > >
> > > Is there a way to dynamically create and/or modify Value Objects so
> they
> > > can be changed without re-compiling the .SWF file? So that if a
> particular
> > > client wants stuff tracked that a different client doesn't want
> tracked, we
> > > don't have to create a generic version of our database that has all
> these
> > > extra fields in it, which most clients don't need?
> > >
> > > As it stands right now, the Value Objects force us to make every
> database
> > > for every show exactly the same -- unless we modify the Value Objects
> for
> > > each individual show and re-compile a separate .SWF file for that
> show... If
> > > there were a way to write, say, an .XML file that the program could
> read and
> > > modify itself accordingly for each show, that would be brilliant. Is
> there a
> > > way to do that?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Laurence MacNeill
> > > Mableton, Georgia, USA
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to