Brian, Thanks for the additional info, but what I am really asking for is unambigious language about what your debugging has discovered so far. If you are using parent.FABridge on the JS side, what does parent point to? Is it what you expect? If you place breakpoints on the AS side, do you get any hits there?
On 9/2/10 6:14 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann" <brian.ackerm...@gmail.com> wrote: Alex, I thank you for your patience. However, in one of my earlier posts on this thread I did give quite a lot of details about my particular situation (which is almost certainly different, but at the same time, related to, the other posters issue). In my case, I'm using an IFrame component (from http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/) to display a credit card data collection & processing application (for PCI reasons, we do not wish to have the CC data collected via our main application) What I wish to happen, is for the 'hosted' app to be able to tell the 'hosting' flex app that it has completed its job, so that the flex app can change the ui, to present the main dashboard again, or perhaps a new order builder screen, or whatever. The problem is that my hosted html app (via javascript) is unable to communicate with its host flex app. There is an example of exactly this sort of behavior here ( http://ccgi.arutherford.plus.com/website/flex/iframe/IFrameBridgeTest/ ). FYI, I know for sure that this doesn't work (on Windows) with Chrome of Safari, but it does work with IE, FF, and Opera. What I've done, is to take the flex3 project here( http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/source/browse/trunk/examples/IFrameCommTest/ ), and just do a simple conversion of the code to flex4. I've exported my version of the project to facilitate help ( http://www.mediafire.com/file/172448jkkgva4ki/iframeCommTest.fxp ) The issue I'm trying to resolve, is why the code works fine in flex3, but not in flex4, and my best guess as to what is wrong is that its got something to do with swfobject being used in the flex4 version causing a change to the location of the FABridge object in the hosted html pages DOM. Hopefully that clears up some of the confusion. Thanks ________________________________ Brian J. Ackermann brian.ackerm...@gmail.com 952.373.1626 ________________________________ On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: So from my perspective, you aren’t being specific enough. You are saying that parent.FABridge doesn’t exist, the OP said something else. There are two DOMs, the JS DOM and the AS DOM. You are now saying you can’t find the object, but you aren’t saying which object. If parent.FABridge is null, then it sounds like a JS setup issue. Either FABridge.js isn’t being loaded or isn’t loaded in the right place. You might try your own test js file to see if you can find objects from your test file. On 9/1/10 6:27 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann" < brian.ackerm...@gmail.com <http://brian.ackerm...@gmail.com> > wrote: Yes, I've tried debugging on the JS side of things, exactly as you mentioned (See my email in this thread from Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:45 PM). Nothing. I simply can't find the object. I used a javascript object dump function, to 'scan' the objects I could think of, looking for an occurrence of this object that we need for FABridge to work, but its tucked away somewhere, in a place which is non-trivial to locate. ________________________________ Brian J. Ackermann brian.ackerm...@gmail.com <http://brian.ackerm...@gmail.com> 952.373.1626 ________________________________ On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Brian J. Ackermann < brian.ackerm...@gmail.com <http://brian.ackerm...@gmail.com> > wrote: Alex, I think thats (the swfobject) probably getting pretty close to the right line of thinking, and its something that I'd considered briefly myself, but I am not savvy enough yet to make heads or tails of the issue. ________________________________ Brian J. Ackermann brian.ackerm...@gmail.com <http://brian.ackerm...@gmail.com> 952.373.1626 ________________________________ On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Alex Harui < aha...@adobe.com <http://aha...@adobe.com> > wrote: I don’t have time to try it right now. In Flex 4, the tag goes inside the fx:Declarations tag. I took a quick look at the AS code and it uses ExternalInterface so it shouldn’t be sensitive to changes between Flex 3 and 4. Have you tried debugging from both sides? Use a JS debugger or stick a bunch of alerts in the JS code and see what sub-expressions are null (parent, parent.FABridge, parent.FABridge.foo, etc). Then put breakpoints on the AS side like FABridge.as.getRoot(). Are you using a new Flex 4 template that now uses SWFObject instead of AC_OETags.js? It shouldn’t make a difference unless you’re simply not including the right JS in the template. On 8/30/10 2:36 PM, "gmbroth" <gmbr...@hotmail.com <http://gmbr...@hotmail.com> <http://gmbr...@hotmail.com> > wrote: Hi, Was this problem resolved? I have Flex 3 MXML that defines: <mx:Application> ... <utils:FABridge bridgeName="foo"/> ... </mx:Application> In Flex 4, must this statement now appear inside an <fx:Declarations> element? Even if there's no other fx namespace elements being used in the MXML? On the JavaScript side, I've been referencing the bridge as: FABridge.foo.root() which works fine in Flex 3 but doesn't resolve the bridge in Flex 4. How is the bridge referenced? Thanks, Garry --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <http://flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> <http://flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Brian J. Ackermann" <brian.ackerm...@...> wrote: > > http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/source/browse/trunk/examples/IFrameCommTest/src/com/google/code/flexiframe/examples/IFrameCommTest.mxml > > > lines 80 & 81 > > in the original example, there was no ID > > Thanks > > ------------------------------ > Brian J. Ackermann > brian.ackerm...@... > 952.373.1626 > ------------------------------ > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > I just noticed you didn't specify an id="FABridge" in your > > <fx:Declarations> > > > > What was the equivalent statement in Flex 3? > > > > > > > > On 8/26/10 10:45 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann" <brian.ackerm...@...> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From my testing, I believe the problem is on the JS side of thing, and that > > the FABridge doesn't 'live' in the same location in the DOM in flex4, as > > compared with flex3. > > > > But we're both reasonably novice flex developers, so we could be > > mis-interpreting what we're seeing. In another version of the project, I > > have added some debugging to a text area on screen, and > > "this.parent.FABridge" and "parent.FABridge" and "FABridge" all return > > 'undefined'. Since that used to work just fine in flex3, it seems like > > maybe I just need to find the new 'path' in the DOM.... > > > > for example: > > > > this.parent.foo.bar.blah.FABridge > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brian > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Brian J. Ackermann > > brian.ackerm...@... > > 952.373.1626 > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't have time right now to look and I don't deal much with FABridge, > > but are you now saying that parent.FABridge is now the issue? The OP said > > it was FABridge.flex. Is this on the JS side or AS side? In Flex 4, a > > child component's parent is not the main app, they get shoveled down into > > the skin. It think the document or parentDocument properties or > > FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication can access the main app. > > > > > > > > > > On 8/26/10 9:10 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann" <brian.ackerm...@... < > > http://brian.ackerm...@...> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to get the IFrameCommTest example (from > > http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/) to work in Flex 4, and, while the > > IFrame itself works, the communication does not. In particular, I need to > > get the included HTML page to call functions from the flex app (I already > > have a way to get the Flex app to talk to the HTML). > > > > I've exported the project to facilitate your help. > > http://www.mediafire.com/file/172448jkkgva4ki/iframeCommTest.fxp > > > > The problem, is that the "parent.FABridge" doesn't exist. My guess is that > > something in flex4 changed with regard to how things are located in the DOM. > > > > (This post is directly related to the original. I just thought this would > > be a clearer example of the problem. ) > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Brian J. Ackermann > > brian.ackerm...@... <http://brian.ackerm...@...> > > 952.373.1626 > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alex Harui > > Flex SDK Team > > Adobe System, Inc. > > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > > > > > -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe System, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
