My application will try to connect to a java framework, which in turn calls 
some scripts to execute on a server.
If it is a firmware update script that is called, it will typically wait for 
2-3 minutes before the update on the server is complete. So I have to keep user 
understand that process is going on (or else, they may think the system is 
hanged or not responding with 2 minutes of spinning), to provide 
some understandably, I am thinking of static pooling a progress bar for 2-3 
(standard time which we know) minutes that looks more user friendly. What say?
 
Cheers,
Venkat. 
 
 



>________________________________
> From: Paul Andrews <p...@ipauland.com>
>To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:13 AM
>Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Timed Progress bar for 2 minutes.
> 
>
>  
>On 10/01/2012 09:17, claudiu ursica wrote: 
>Are you sure it is exactly 2 minutes?
>>DO you really need to show progress? A spinning animation might suit you 
>>better, keep it spinning until the load is done.
>It would just look like the application had hung.
>
>As Rick suggested, two minutes is a very long time. What is it that
    takes two minutes to be ready?
>
>If it's a database query, I'd suggest sorting out the server,
    because two minutes is a ridiculous amount of time to be waiting for
    a result.
>
>It really looks like your application has a fundamental problem.
>
>Paul
>
>
>>
>>C
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: Venkat M <venkat_...@yahoo.com>
>>To: "flexcoders@yahoogroups.com" <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> 
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 2:09 AM
>>Subject: [flexcoders] Timed Progress bar for 2 minutes.
>> 
>>
>>  
>>Hi,
>> 
>>I have a scenario in my application.
>> 
>>I know that the wait time for the response is 2 minutes. 
>>Can someone let me know how we can run a progress bar for 2 minutes loading 
>>from 0% to 100% in the same 2 minutes?
>> 
>>Or
>>                                                                                                                                                          
>> 
>>Is there a better way to indicate the wait for 2 minutes? (This is a fixed 
>>wait time)
>> 
>>Cheers,
>>Venkat.  
>> 
>> 
>>
>
> 
>
>

Reply via email to