Thanks everyone! This input is fantastic. Lots to learn and think about, but I'm really glad I took the time to look at Flex 2.
Sincerely, Bryan > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Gonzalez > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: FLEX and Open Lazslo Comparision > > > Does it happen to remove the unused components? What if I'm > only using > > one button - does Flex include all components? > > Flex only includes classes found in the dependency chain from > your application class (or configuration settings). > > When you create an application that extends > mx.core.Application, you get a bunch of things that a toy > application might not need, but that a real-world application > probably will. > > A Flex app has a higher initial cost, but levels off. > Flex also allows you to write your own frameworks from scratch in AS. > > > I believe they're also working on ways to use shared runtime > > libraries/frameworks so it'll be possible to include apps > that don't > > include the framework, instead reuse the libs supplied in the > > container application - makes it easier to break your apps into > > smaller, reuseable modules. > > Flex has this today. See the "runtime-shared-libraries" > and "externs" and "external-library-path" configuration options. > > -rg -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
