OUT OF CONTEXT --- In [email protected], "Ikezi Kamanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maxym, you're the best (in so many ways). > > This is such groundbreaking insight, do keep it coming. > > e k z > ___________________ > Ikezi Kamanu > Adobe Consulting > > > > On 4/11/06, maxym.hryniv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ted, You've not understood me one more time. I don't have a problem > > with creating my own code with my own logic (btw your code is bad ). > > But as a developer you don't have to be targeted to some concrete case > > but you have to operate with abstractions. And if in bubbled > > dispatching you see events dispatching through a tree of visual > > object, I see few abstractions that we can separate from each other. > > And if now it's not separated it's not so extensible as it can be. And > > the question was NOT "how to create some bla-bla-bla with bla- bla- > > bla" BUT "Why we have different abstractions hardcoded in one class > > and why Adobe doesn't provide better solution, cause it can be better > > even leaving current interface??? And looking back to flex 1.5 > > framework code I'm not wondered, cause it's created using copy&paste." > > > > Hope you will understand me this time. > > Max > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > >
-- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
