This is such groundbreaking insight, do keep it coming.
e k z
___________________
Ikezi Kamanu
Adobe Consulting
On 4/11/06, maxym.hryniv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ted, You've not understood me one more time. I don't have a problem
with creating my own code with my own logic (btw your code is bad).
But as a developer you don't have to be targeted to some concrete case
but you have to operate with abstractions. And if in bubbled
dispatching you see events dispatching through a tree of visual
object, I see few abstractions that we can separate from each other.
And if now it's not separated it's not so extensible as it can be. And
the question was NOT "how to create some … bla-bla-bla with bla-bla-
bla" BUT "Why we have different abstractions hardcoded in one class
and why Adobe doesn't provide better solution, cause it can be better
even leaving current interface??? And looking back to flex 1.5
framework code I'm not wondered, cause it's created using copy&paste."
Hope you will understand me this time.
Max
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
