I'm pretty sure we consider this desired behavior. I will file an enhancement to turn off the batching but I doubt it will make it into Flex 2.
Matt -----Original Message----- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sof4real03 Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 3:01 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in parallel? Yes, that was the workaround. Is there look into changing the behavior of NetConnection in the player before Flex is released for production? By the way, thanks for the code tip. - Sof --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Farland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Was that the workaround that involved using a unique endpoint URL to > avoid connection sharing? > > If so, in FDS 2 you could create a new AMFChannel and assign it as part > of a service's channelSet:ChannelSet property. > > import mx.messaging.ChannelSet; > import mx.messaging.Channel; > import mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel; > > ... > > var channelSet:ChannelSet = new ChannelSet(); > var channel:Channel = new AMFChannel("my-amf", > "http://localhost:8700/cfusion/messagebroker/amf";); > channelSet.addChannel(channel); > remoteObject.channelSet = channelSet; > > ... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of sof4real03 > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:26 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in > parallel? > > If RemoteObjects results do not come back in parallel then how would one > implement the workaround Peter Ent posted since the "endpoint" > attribute is no longer supported in Flex 2. > > Thanks, > Sof > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Farland" <pfarland@> wrote: > > > > It isn't up to the Flex RemoteObject feature... it's how the flash > > player NetConnection works with AMF requests (and continues to work in > > > FP 8.5). > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of sof4real03 > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 3:15 PM > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in > > > parallel? > > > > Does anyone know if this is a still an outstanding design of > > RemoteObjects and AMF? > > > > Much thanks, > > Sof > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "sof4real03" <soubraham2@> wrote: > > > > > > I've come across an article by Peter Ent regarding how AMF results > > > using RemoteObjects do not return in parallel, but wait until all > > > requests are completed. He also posted a workaround. I was just > > > wondering if this is still a valid workaround or has the design been > > > > revamped with the Data Services? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Sof > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > Search Archives: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
