|
Director's engine supports embedding ActiveX
controls whereas Flash does not. Director is a more heavyweight plugin as
consequence whereas Flash Player is significantly lighter and more ubiquitious
as a result. There is a tradeoff to filesize, and embedding is not
necessarely mutually exclusive.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] OpenGL vs DirectX / Vista vs. Flash Player
9 MS comments about Flash re Vista
yes, but if you can run flash in director, you should be able to
run director in flash. Of course, the developer could just use the iframe
trick.
On 4/28/06, JesterXL
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
They did that in another product, Director, and
it runs hardware accelerated 3D on the web.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 6:54 AM
Subject: [flexcoders] OpenGL vs DirectX / Vista vs. Flash Player 9
MS comments about Flash re Vista
PRE-TEXT:
Just some encouragement. You guys at Adobe are smart and I know you can
put in a DirectX like API that is perhaps a triggered add-on to the normal
Flash Player, something that says "This site includes high-end real time
graphics; do you want to download the OpenGL Flash Player support extension?"
I just saw a Video this morning after reading Dvorak's article
that IE is now an albatross due to their loss to Eolas in December and the
11th of this month requiring a huge change to ActiveX control interaction.
The video was a cross link and discussed the lack of real 3D with
texturing etc. (DirectX) in Flash and a hint that "our technology you can't do
on a browser".
Well, you can in an ActiveX control but now that's
Screwed :-)
So Vista WinFX and the Macintosh "Viewer" (i.e. not
designer app) will be this coming "Headon Collision between Adobe and
Microsoft".
I just want to encourage the FLEX and Flash 9 developers to
try and bust Mickeysoft's bubble when it comes to the fact that they are an
old man who is slowly dying -- they will be kept alive for a long time by
their Cash Reserve which, some say has a lot of money in it through dirty
tricks -- but in the end, I believe Adobe will come out ahead.
Again,
the FLEX group and FLASH group are full of very smart guys enough so to put in
a DirectX like API that is perhaps a triggered add-on to the normal Flash
Player, something that says "This site includes high-end real time graphics;
do you want to download the OpenGL Flash Player support extension?"
-r
-r
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for
ridiculously low rates.
-- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED
LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [flexcoders] OpenGL vs DirectX / Vista vs. Flash Playe... JesterXL
-