It is valid XML. There are 'limits' to what you can do with the schema when compared to how dynamic Flex can be.
"Hi, there are no plans at the moment to provide an xsd for Flex 2. It's something we can consider for a future release or maybe the community will write one that they find useful. We've found that the MXML language ended up not really lending itself to a schema because schema can't handle many of the things that are valid in MXML (like providing a property as either a child tag or an attribute)." - Matt Chotin --- In [email protected], Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:05, Daniel Tuppeny wrote: > > If it's not, it certainly shouldn't have XML in its name, or an xml > > decleration at the top!! > > *Exactly* what I thought. > The <XML> at the top means - "this is validly formed XML". > > -- > Tom Chiverton ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
