I agree. These justifications do not convince me either. Thanks for your response, JesterXL. Very helpful :)
--- In [email protected], "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The justifications listed here are pretty weak. > http://weblogs.macromedia.com/auhlmann/archives/2006/07/cairngorm_2_for.cfm > > RemoteObject, WebService, and HTTPRequest all return ResultEvent & > FaultEvent events. It's also cake to have stubs return ResultEvent & > FaultEvents for testing services before they are written. Finally, who the > heck is using Cairngorm 2 without the the Flex framework? > > To me, the last argument is the only thing that is even remotely > justifiable. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "der_kotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 8:30 PM > Subject: [flexcoders] Cairngorm Responder interface changes > > > Hi, > > I was just wondering why the com.adobe.cairngorm.business.Responder > interface has been changed since it has been released on Adobe Labs. > In Cairngorm 2.0 alpha (org.nevis.cairngorm.business.Responder) the > parameters of the onFault and onResult handlers were typed events > (ResultEvent and FaultEvent). > > Why have the parameters been changed to '*'? Where is the sense in > that? To my opinion this is not really best practice but maybe > there's a really good reason for that? Does anyone know? > > Cheers > David > > > > > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
