Agreed, no problem here. -TH
--- In [email protected], "Dimitrios Gianninas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just read the article, seems much cleaner, something definitely considering. > > Also don't think its much of bother going from 1.x to 2.0, there are many changes to make upgrading anyways :) > > Dimitrios Gianninas > RIA Developer > Optimal Payments Inc. > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Webster > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService & Cairngorm 2 Example > > > > Darron makes some very fair points; our reasoning for the current Cairngorm implementation was driven from some findings we had during the beta, which no longer seem to apply. We'll have some discussion internally to reinforce our decisions, but Darron's approach seems a sensible and valid one that we may likely end up bringing into the main codebase. > > How would folks feel about us making that change ? We're always very reticent of API changes for backward compatibility.....would folks be ok with this one ? > > Steven > > Steven Webster > Practice Director (Rich Internet Applications) > Adobe Consulting > Westpoint, 4 Redheughs Rigg, South Gyle, Edinburgh, EH12 9DQ, UK > p: +44 (0) 131 338 6108 > m: +44 (0) 7917 428 947 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard > Sent: 06 July 2006 16:07 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService & Cairngorm 2 Example > > > > Darron Schall just posted a great article about Cairngorm's Responder > interface and what he considers to be a better alternative. > > http://www.darronschall.com/weblog/archives/000234.cfm <http://www.darronschall.com/weblog/archives/000234.cfm> > > > > > > -- > WARNING > ------- > This electronic message and its attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information, which is solely for the use of the intended recipient. No privilege or other rights are waived by any unintended transmission or unauthorized retransmission of this message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if you have received it in error, you should immediately stop reading this message and delete it and all attachments from your system. The reading, distribution, copying or other use of this message or its attachments by unintended recipients is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. > > AVIS IMPORTANT > -------------- > Ce message électronique et ses pièces jointes peuvent contenir des renseignements confidentiels, exclusifs ou légalement privilégiés destinés au seul usage du destinataire visé. L'expéditeur original ne renonce à aucun privilège ou à aucun autre droit si le présent message a été transmis involontairement ou s'il est retransmis sans son autorisation. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire visé du présent message ou si vous l'avez reçu par erreur, veuillez cesser immédiatement de le lire et le supprimer, ainsi que toutes ses pièces jointes, de votre système. La lecture, la distribution, la copie ou tout autre usage du présent message ou de ses pièces jointes par des personnes autres que le destinataire visé ne sont pas autorisés et pourraient être illégaux. Si vous avez reçu ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur. > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
