This is a known bug that is listed in the known issues on the ASDoc
wiki.  I briefly investigated this, and I have no idea why it's
happening.  Sorry, no workaround known.  It's a bug that we should fix
for the next release.  -Brian 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Polanco
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 3:34 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: ASDoc ignores Bindable properties?
> 
> Sorry, my last reply was not really clear with an example.  Here is
> what I am seeing
> 
> package com.mysite.proj
> {
> 
> [Bindable]
> public class myClass
> {
> 
> public var myString:String;
> public var myObject:EventDispatcher;
> 
> .... methods and such
> 
> When I ASDoc this myString and myObject do not show up in ASDoc at
> all.  If I remove the [Bindable] they do.  This is the problem that I
> am seeing.  Is this technique still valid?
> 
> James
> 
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Seth Hodgson" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi James,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Try putting your property documentation beneath the [Bindable] tag.
> > E.g.:
> > 
> > [Bindable]
> > /**
> >  * ... your property documentation ...
> > 
> >  */
> > 
> > public function get propX():X { ... }
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > ASDoc comments apply to what they precede.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Best,
> > Seth
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of james_dhap
> > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 11:28 AM
> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [flexcoders] ASDoc ignores Bindable properties?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Hey All,
> > I am seeing odd behaviour using the [Bindable] metadata tag in my AS
> > classes. When ever my public properties have the [Bindable] 
> tag ASDoc
> > ignores them and does not generate comments. I first saw this with
> > some of my ValueObjects that use the metadata at the root of the
> > class, but even when I moved it to just one propety that property
> > disappears from the docs.
> > 
> > At the moment its not a huge issue because its not really 
> affecting my
> > documentation, but it will very shortly. Any tips? Possible
> > workaround ideas? Is this intended?
> > 
> > James
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to