|
OK, so I’ve watching this thread
going back and forth over and over… Now it’s time for my two cents.
It looks like this thread began by someone saying that you cannot use web
services in a real world flex application. I’ve got to agree with
Dave on this. You definitely can, and we have done it numerous times here
at Cynergy. Are there tradeoffs? Yes. As
others have said already in the post: The decision on what mechanism to
use should be dealt with on a case by case basis. Let’s
consider a few things:
I personally like using remote objects,
but not every solution allows for this. In the cases where you cannot use
remote objects, web services still work great. SOAP is a very verbose
protocol, but by no means is it unusable. If that were the case, why
would web services be so prevalent? Why would there be all the buzz about
service oriented architectures? If you feel that a web service is too
verbose or too slow, and you can’t use remote objects, then use a
HTTPService to return XML. There are many solutions. It really all
boils down to how you use and retrieve your data and depends on your requirements
and application architecture. If the processing time on the server
is too much for your application to handle, then chances are there is a problem
with your application’s back end, not the webservice/serialization layer.
To generalize and say that you should
never use a web service is a very big mistake. -Andy _____________________________________ Andrew Trice Cynergy Systems, Inc. Blog: http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/page/andrewtrice Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 866-CYNERGY From: Martin: OK . . . . so the lag time is when the
data gets back to the end-user? Bottom line . . . . with all things being
equal . . . . Does a web service request take longer to
process on the server than a AMF request? If the answer is . . . . in general yes,
then that can be an issue with an increase in users. If the answer is . . . . it depends on the
data being requested and/or the data format then that seems to suggest
that everyone must run tests to compare results and then test again
based on scaling up. Is that about right? Thanks, Jack From:
-- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
__,_._,___ |
- RE: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backen... Andrew Trice
- [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backe... Mark Piller
- RE: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice ... Franck de Bruijn
- [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice ... Mark Piller
- RE: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of b... Carson Hager
- RE: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of b... Dustin Mercer

