Re: [flexcoders] Flex Deployment Best Practices

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:15:47 -0700

Hi Matt,

I'm very pleased to see Roger's module manager classes coming into the next updater of the flex framework. That's a very needed feature...maybe the number one for me and many others. Can't wait to get my hands dirty with the new stuff. Hope you could tell us something about when we could expect the updater :).

Best,

C.


On 10/23/06, Matt Chotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The modules will help reduce your app and can be used to help reduce break the framework up as well so that only pieces that are needed will be in modules that you're using.  We will have improved support + docs for that in the next release.  We are also working on some ideas/documentation for breaking the framework up a little more.  With that said, if you are building a single app, you won't get much benefit from an RSL.  Only if your app is truly big, then it's the module approach you want more than RSL.  RSLs come into play when you start having multiple apps that re-use the same code.

 

Matt

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of hank williams
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex Deployment Best Practices

 

I have been glancing at Roger's blog, for the last month or two, but the one thing I am not clear on is whether the work that he is doing reduces the all or nothing nature of the actual flex framework? I am very clear on how to modularize my own code, but if the flex framework's dependecies are such that for anything meaningful you need to load 300-400k of library then none of my modularization makes much difference because my code is small relative to the size of the library. While he acknowledges the problem, I can't find where Roger discusses much about whether all of the flex framework really needs to be dragged in the way it is now, and if his new stuff helps to fix this.

Regards
Hank

On 10/23/06, David Mendels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello,

 

Roger's blog might be helpful: http://blogs.adobe.com/rgonzalez/flex/

 

-David

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Kirby
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 7:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [flexcoders] Flex Deployment Best Practices

I'm about to deploy my first Flex application.

I have tried to modularize my components as much as possible.

What I'm looking for is some best practices on when/why you create RSLs, SWFs, etc to "break up" your application so it runs efficiently.  I know there are some trade-offs here... just looking for some reference guidelines for the "ilities" ( scalability, maintainability, etc.).

Thanks.

.j

--
Whether you think that you can, or that you can't, you are usually right.
 - Henry Ford

 




--
::| Carlos Rovira
::| http://www.carlosrovira.com
::| http://www.madeinflex.com __._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Software development tool Software development Software development services
Home design software Software development company

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to