|
This is an obvious question, but instead of trying to add
their plugins to your installation of FB2, have you tried the other way? That
is, install FB2 as a plug-in to their Eclipse 3.2 (instead of installing FB2
standalone)? From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dorkie dork from dorktown Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [flexcoders] FB2 != Eclipse 3.2 I have been using the Flex Builder Stand alone to do development work.
Recently, I was working at a company that is using Eclipse 3.2. Being that FB2
is a build of Eclipse, I tried to install the required plugs to work with their
project. We found out that FB2 is build of Eclipse version 3.1 and the plug-ins
we need require Eclipse 3.2. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
- RE: [flexcoders] FB2 != Eclipse 3.2 Peter Farland
- Re: [flexcoders] FB2 != Eclipse 3.2 douglas morrison
- Re: [flexcoders] FB2 != Eclipse 3.2 dorkie dork from dorktown
- Re: [flexcoders] FB2 != Eclipse 3.2 douglas morrison
- Re: [flexcoders] FB2 != Eclipse 3.2 Douglas McCarroll
- [flexcoders] Re: FB2 != Eclipse... carm_scaffidi

