Sorry for reply to myself - but this is driving me _nuts_! I can't find an example of bindSetter with a 'real' accessor function with either yahoo or google. And the example on the 'bindUtils' page at adobe.com (stuck in the comments at the bottom) - doesn't bind to a 'function set blah'... (isn't that the _required_ to consider a funciton/method a 'setter' ??) It just binds to a 'normal' function.
Anyway, I'm starting to think that 'bindSetter' is really a poorly named 'bindFunction' and that _all_ properties - var OR accessor based should be using bindProperty. Can someone confirm/refute this and save my sanity please! Thanks On 12/3/06, Steve Hindle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got to be missing something silly here: > > _model:Model; > > BindSetter(_model.title,... ? String to Function coercion error > BindSetter(_model.title()... ? Inaccessible method title error > > I thought about _model.title as Function - but that seems like it > would interpret the title string as a function name ? So what is the > right syntax for this? > > I also noticed the same problem with setters defined in the same AS > file - I get a 'blah to Function coercion error' ?? > > TIA! >
