Yeah, I would much prefer it if they slowed down their innovation substantially. Because I am absolutely sure that is the way microsoft looks at it. In fact I think Bruce Chizen should call Steve Balmer and say something like this. "you know, as a favor to our users lets agree that we will give then at least three years between releases so we dont bum them out with too much stuff, you know this stuff *is* kinda hard dude".
And Balmer would say, "Sure Bruce, I know what you mean. And even though we do want to put you out of business, fair is fair. Lets agree to a two year innovation pause. That'll give both our user bases time to take a breather. And we can let our developers focus on putting someone else out of business!" Yup, thats whats gonna happen! Hank On 1/25/07, Adam Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know if anybody else has signed up for the Flex 3 beta, but does > anyone else feel that Flex 3 is a little bit too close to Flex 2? > > I was discussing this with an editor of a PC magazine, here in the UK, > and he was very surprised. > > I'm assuming Adobe will not be charging much for upgrades from 2 to 3 > and is it really such a good idea to be going up a whole new version > when Flex 2 has literally been around for months, not even years. > > I really would like Adobe to comment on this as this seems a bit messed > up. Can they assure the community that there will be a minor charge for > upgrading from 2 to 3? > > Adam > > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
