did you try it with Objects? It sounds reasonable to me. I don't see why it would not work. I'm doing SOAP so I can't really try it out myself.
Paul --- In [email protected], "Shaun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I assume that means there isn't a way to do this with objects? I > would rather avoid XML, as objects would be considerably faster and > smaller to work with. > > Shaun > > --- In [email protected], "Tracy Spratt" <tspratt@> wrote: > > > > If you use the XML object, you can add attributes to it at will. > > > > Tracy > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Shaun > > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:54 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [flexcoders] Server vs Client Object > > > > > > > > I think this question probably has an obvious answer, but I want to > > make sure I am using something resembling best practices, so I > decided > > I better ask: > > > > If I have a server object that has a set of persistent properties, > but > > on the client I want to add some temporary properties and/or logic, > > what is the best way to accomplish this? > > > > The problem is that I want to use RemoteObject to get my objects > from > > the server, but I want them to have additional properties and/or > > functions when on the client. > > > > Do only properties present on the server get populated on the > client, > > with the others getting their default values?.. or will I have to > > create client side objects by copying values from generic server > side > > objects? > > > > Thanks for any help, > > Shaun > > >
