I haven't been able to successfully get the objects to show up in flex typed correctly yet (they're always just 'Object'). I'm trying to track down the issue and wondering if what I'm trying is even possible.
Shaun --- In [email protected], "Paul DeCoursey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > did you try it with Objects? It sounds reasonable to me. I don't see > why it would not work. I'm doing SOAP so I can't really try it out > myself. > > Paul > > > --- In [email protected], "Shaun" <sthalberstadt@> wrote: > > > > I assume that means there isn't a way to do this with objects? I > > would rather avoid XML, as objects would be considerably faster and > > smaller to work with. > > > > Shaun > > > > --- In [email protected], "Tracy Spratt" <tspratt@> wrote: > > > > > > If you use the XML object, you can add attributes to it at will. > > > > > > Tracy > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > > Behalf Of Shaun > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:54 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Server vs Client Object > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this question probably has an obvious answer, but I want to > > > make sure I am using something resembling best practices, so I > > decided > > > I better ask: > > > > > > If I have a server object that has a set of persistent properties, > > but > > > on the client I want to add some temporary properties and/or logic, > > > what is the best way to accomplish this? > > > > > > The problem is that I want to use RemoteObject to get my objects > > from > > > the server, but I want them to have additional properties and/or > > > functions when on the client. > > > > > > Do only properties present on the server get populated on the > > client, > > > with the others getting their default values?.. or will I have to > > > create client side objects by copying values from generic server > > side > > > objects? > > > > > > Thanks for any help, > > > Shaun > > > > > >
