Well, the Player uses the browser's network stack so that it can be in sync with what the browser is doing (cookies) as well as reduce the amount of code we have to include in the runtime (size is critical as you know). In Apollo we need to use the system network layer so we actually hope to have more access to the information you're looking for, but for the plugins we rely on the browser. Were we to write our own network layer in AS we would lose the browser integration that is often important.
Matt ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul DeCoursey Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:45 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService Fault Handling - Flash Player 9 Update I find it hard to believe that we can create our own implementation that would support this using sockets but the built in method requires browser vendor help. --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Matt Chotin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unfortunately we cannot fix this without support from the browser > vendors. We are in discussions with them to try to have the right > information accessible to plugins in some of their next versions. > > Matt > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > Behalf Of paulwelling > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:59 AM > To: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [flexcoders] WebService Fault Handling - Flash Player 9 Update > > > > Hello, > > I just examined the latest FP9 Update Fixed Issues web page, and see > no mention of the WebService Fault Handling Issue (fault body not > passed to player) that has been discussed many times here... > > This is a really big issue for people not using a proxy, and I'm > surprised that more of us haven't asked Adobe for this to be a > priority fix, or at least come up with a real work around. > > Can someone tell me when this will be addressed..? > > Thanks, > Paul >
