check your yahoo account
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "gaurav1146" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please mail me the overloaded bubble series class. My email address is
> gaurav1146 at yahoo.com
> TIA
> Gaurav
>
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "simonjpalmer" <simonjpalmer@>
> wrote:
> >
> > I think it would be illuminating for you to set a breakpoint in the
> > updateTransform method of the BubbleSeries class and check out what
> > flex is doing with renderData.filteredCache. This is what it uses to
> > compute the bubble sizes.
> >
> > You are right, there is no min bubble size, and the basic transform
> > scales the radius, not the area of the bubble, which I find very
> > misleading. What it means is that two bubbles that are a factor of
> > two different in terms of their radiusField value are actually 4 times
> > different in area. This confused the hell out of our users and was
> > logged against us as a bug.
> >
> > I can share an overloaded bubbleseries class with you that I have
> > adjusted to have a min bubble size and which scales the area according
> > to the radiusField and not the radius. Ely Greenfield deserves a
> > mention here for helping me out with it.
> >
> > Let me know if you want the class and I'll email it to you.
> >
> > SP
> >
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "gaurav1146" <gaurav1146@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What you say seems fine that the size of bubbles should change based
> > > on the data set that is displayed. But the problem is that the
size of
> > > all the bubbles that are on display after the slide do not change.
> > > Lets say if initially 6 bubbles were displayed on the chart and
after
> > > the slide motion only 3 are displayed. Then what is happening is
that
> > > in remaining 3, the sizes of only 1 or 2 bubbles change while
the size
> > > of one of them may remain totally unaffected by the slide. Also the
> > > size changes are drastic such that even big bubbles are reduced to
> > > nearly point sized bubbles.
> > >
> > > I do have a maxRadius set up im my bubbleSeries but there seems
to be
> > > no option for minRadius.
> > >
> > > TIA
> > > Gaurav
> > >
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "simonjpalmer" <simonjpalmer@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > do you have the same set of bubbles visible after your slider
> > > > "magnification" as before?
> > > >
> > > > The default bubbleseries sizes the bubbles *that are displayed*
> > > > relative to one another based on the radius field (the series
has a
> > > > display list that it uses for sizing).
> > > >
> > > > If you add or remove bubbles the relative sizes of the remaining
> > > > bubbles change. They still refer to the radius field, but because
> > > > they are a different set they will have different proportions.
> > > >
> > > > Do you have max and min bubble sizes set?
> > > >
> > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "gaurav1146" <gaurav1146@>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I have created a chart which consists of LineSeries and bubble
> > series
> > > > > something like
> > > > > <mx:CartesianChart>
> > > > > ....
> > > > > <mx:Series><mx:LineSeries../><mx:BubbleSeries
..../></mx:Series>
> > > > > </mx:CartesianChart>
> > > > >
> > > > > The sizes of the bubble initially displayed proportionately
> > based on
> > > > > the radiusField in the BubbleSeries. But, now I have added a
> HSlider
> > > > > based of which a user can see/magnify different section of the
> > chart.
> > > > > Based on position of the slider I slice the ArrayCollection that
> > > > > provides data to the series.
> > > > > But, the problem after adding the slider is that the bubble
sizes
> > > > > sometimes do not appear proportionate to the radiusField of the
> > bubble
> > > > > series. I could not figure out the reason for this. Any help
> > would be
> > > > > greatly appreciated.
> > > > > TIA
> > > > > Gaurav
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
