I am sure that no one has a solution so good as Flex. What will adobe do, wait for them to be close.
I do not know what are Adobe plans, but if at this moment there is not a solution ready to use, I am afraid that this solution will only be avaiable when Microsoft will have Visual Studio 2007 ready to use and its technology ajusted and working well. Two years ago Adobe had a lot of time. But now the clock is ticking .... --- In [email protected], "Paul DeCoursey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think you are right that .NET support should be there, although I am > not a .NET developer and probably never will be. I wonder if Microsoft > could develop this solution? In theory they would have the best > resources to understand .NET and enough people have figured out the > protocols used in FDS that they should be able to develop this. > > Anyway, the big flaw in your argument is that Adobe doesn't need to > built the solution when there is one on the market already. > > Paul > > > --- In [email protected], "mvbaffa" <mvbaffa@> wrote: > > > > I beleive that Adobe wants to increase its participation in > > the software development market. .NET is very good and its number of > > developers is huge. That's why they should not be fogotten. > > > > This at least is naive. > > > > Adobe has one thing that Microsoft does not have, FLASH. This is the > > key to success if it is well conducted. > > > > I do not care about politics. I really do not care which is the winner > > Microsoft or Adobe. The winner will be the one that can deploy good and > > affordable products. > > > > --- In [email protected], Bjorn Schultheiss > > <bjorn.schultheiss@> wrote: > > > > > > Think again. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 27/04/2007, at 11:26 AM, mvbaffa wrote: > > > > > > > Everybody uses Windows, almost all the workstations are windows. > > Macs > > > > have IE working OK. > > > > > >
