Beta 2 essentially exposes the features that we have planned for the
Flex 3 release.  But one thing that we talked about at MAX is how
excited developers should be for Thermo, because it means that we're
going to be able to allow Flex Builder to become even more developer
focused while Thermo can solve more problems for designers.  This means
more engineering effort behind the coding features like you mention.

 

So please file and vote for bugs (can't stress the voting enough) at
http://bugs.adobe.com/flex, it's really the best way for us to gauge
what developer features we need to focus on since you should assume we
are not all-powerful and can't get everything done in a single release.

 

Matt 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of dbronk
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [flexcoders] FlexBuilder feature rich? Not as a development
tool.

 

I have seen a sneak peak a month or 2 ago of FlexBuilder 3. I've
tried to load Flex 3 Beta 1 on my box with no luck. It simply erred
out on the install. Have not tried beta 2 yet. But it is beta so
that is fine.

But, from the sneak peak I saw, there were only a few IDE features
added that still leaves it behind almost every other IDE out there. I
know that Flex 3 will add some basic refactoring features and some
people said wow, that's cool!. But I said, wow, it's about time! My
question... How much effort is Adobe putting into the FlexBuilder IDE
(which we pay for) as it is very behind the times as far as expected
developer productivity features (found in almost all FREE progamming
language IDE's). I've been waiting for some extemely basic ones such as:

- Code formatter to reformat code of sloppy developers not caring
about the format of their code.

- Import organization, which organizes, add/deletes imports as needed.

- Smarter indentation. Cut a section of code from one place in my
file to another, it should re-indent as necessary for the destination.

- Renaming or moving a class should go through the entire project and
refactor for me.

These are just some of the most basic things and the list goes on. 
What, if any, should we expect to see in Flex 3?

Don't get me wrong, I think Flex absolutely rocks! But, I do find
that I lose productivity with these very basic and completely expected
features that I'm use to having.

Dale

 

Reply via email to