Here, I've already done the work. PLEASE VOTE! DESIGNERS ALSO USE FLEX
BUILDER.

<rant>
I don't want to wait another release to get designer features in different
program.
</rant>

Features of Thermo should be in Flex Builder 3 (as well)
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-9957

WMODE Related Bugs

Wheel mouse does not work in Firefox when wmode is set to opaque or
transparent
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-12415

When using a transition between states the resize effect flashes the final
resize state before resizing (more apparent with wmode set to opaque or
transparent)
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-12421

Add token for WMODE value in html template wrapper file
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-12485

When using wmode=opaque or transparent text input fields do not allow
special french (possibly other international) characters in Firefox
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-12420

Flex TextInput does not gain focus when cursor is in text field of iframe
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-12377

If you like please vote on a few other issues I have posted. Filed under
"boobiestar".


On 10/5/07, williamkusumo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Let's all vote for wheel-scroll issue on Mac! And also wheel-scroll
> issue when wmode is on! This issue seems to be have plagued Flash
> since the beginning of age, is there a reason why this hasn't been
> resolved yet?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Matt
> Chotin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Beta 2 essentially exposes the features that we have planned for the
> > Flex 3 release. But one thing that we talked about at MAX is how
> > excited developers should be for Thermo, because it means that we're
> > going to be able to allow Flex Builder to become even more developer
> > focused while Thermo can solve more problems for designers. This means
> > more engineering effort behind the coding features like you mention.
> >
> >
> >
> > So please file and vote for bugs (can't stress the voting enough) at
> > http://bugs.adobe.com/flex, it's really the best way for us to gauge
> > what developer features we need to focus on since you should assume we
> > are not all-powerful and can't get everything done in a single release.
> >
> >
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
> [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > Behalf Of dbronk
> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:34 AM
> > To: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [flexcoders] FlexBuilder feature rich? Not as a development
> > tool.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have seen a sneak peak a month or 2 ago of FlexBuilder 3. I've
> > tried to load Flex 3 Beta 1 on my box with no luck. It simply erred
> > out on the install. Have not tried beta 2 yet. But it is beta so
> > that is fine.
> >
> > But, from the sneak peak I saw, there were only a few IDE features
> > added that still leaves it behind almost every other IDE out there. I
> > know that Flex 3 will add some basic refactoring features and some
> > people said wow, that's cool!. But I said, wow, it's about time! My
> > question... How much effort is Adobe putting into the FlexBuilder IDE
> > (which we pay for) as it is very behind the times as far as expected
> > developer productivity features (found in almost all FREE progamming
> > language IDE's). I've been waiting for some extemely basic ones such as:
> >
> > - Code formatter to reformat code of sloppy developers not caring
> > about the format of their code.
> >
> > - Import organization, which organizes, add/deletes imports as needed.
> >
> > - Smarter indentation. Cut a section of code from one place in my
> > file to another, it should re-indent as necessary for the destination.
> >
> > - Renaming or moving a class should go through the entire project and
> > refactor for me.
> >
> > These are just some of the most basic things and the list goes on.
> > What, if any, should we expect to see in Flex 3?
> >
> > Don't get me wrong, I think Flex absolutely rocks! But, I do find
> > that I lose productivity with these very basic and completely expected
> > features that I'm use to having.
> >
> > Dale
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to