ah, I see. ok. At the employer I was at, we didn't have fancy Ant builds and such, so moving code out as text was easy like ColdFusion, ASP, etc world. The first request after a code change was slow yes, but that was a one time hit. In the future I'd pre-compile though and follow the way of the Ant. Though I suspect that folks working with CF backend and LCDS may prefer the web-tier as no pre-compile would be needed at all for any code, eh?
DK On 10/23/07, Dimitrios Gianninas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thats the way I look at too, we pre-compile everything fro PROD, I mean > in PROD the app isnt going to change and it greatly helps on load/wait time. > Just in weaves in nicely with our regular build process, for every app we > build the java and flex portion at the same time via ant. > > *Dimitrios Gianninas* > *RIA Developer and Team Lead* > *Optimal Payments Inc.* > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Battershall, Jeff > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2007 11:07 AM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Flex3 - LCDS anyone know status? Does it work? > > In one of the presentations at MAX, it was discouraged due to > performance overhead. My experience with it going back to Flex 1.5 (and > granted things might be a bit different now) was that the web tier would > cache compiled instances and getting rid of them when code was updated was > kind of a pain. > > In production, what would web-tier compilation give you? I suppose it > depends on your target user base, size of application, and so on. When we > moved from web-tier to pre-compilation, we noticed a substantial speed > increase when the application was instantiated. > > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Douglas Knudsen > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2007 10:54 AM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Flex3 - LCDS anyone know status? Does it work? > > > > On 10/23/07, Battershall, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > LCDS sure does work. Web tier compilation for production deployments > > is > > not recommended. For development it would be OK. > > > > > > > curious why you say this? I've used the web-tier compiler in a > production environment no issue. > > DK > > How you get LCDS working depends on how you're using it - what > > container/middleware are you using? > > > > Jeff > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com<flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] > > On > > Behalf Of John Menke > > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:08 PM > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [flexcoders] Flex3 - LCDS anyone know status? Does it work? > > > > If somebody has it working can you pls give me a few pointers on how you > > got it running. Is there a web tier compiler for Flex3?? > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > Search Archives: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > -- > Douglas Knudsen > http://www.cubicleman.com > this is my signature, like it? > > *AVIS IMPORTANT* > > *WARNING* > > Ce message électronique et ses pièces jointes peuvent contenir des > renseignements confidentiels, exclusifs ou légalement privilégiés destinés > au seul usage du destinataire visé. L'expéditeur original ne renonce à aucun > privilège ou à aucun autre droit si le présent message a été transmis > involontairement ou s'il est retransmis sans son autorisation. Si vous > n'êtes pas le destinataire visé du présent message ou si vous l'avez reçu > par erreur, veuillez cesser immédiatement de le lire et le supprimer, ainsi > que toutes ses pièces jointes, de votre système. La lecture, la > distribution, la copie ou tout autre usage du présent message ou de ses > pièces jointes par des personnes autres que le destinataire visé ne sont pas > autorisés et pourraient être illégaux. Si vous avez reçu ce courrier > électronique par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur. > > This electronic message and its attachments may contain confidential, > proprietary or legally privileged information, which is solely for the use > of the intended recipient. No privilege or other rights are waived by any > unintended transmission or unauthorized retransmission of this message. If > you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if you have received > it in error, you should immediately stop reading this message and delete it > and all attachments from your system. The reading, distribution, copying or > other use of this message or its attachments by unintended recipients is > unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please notify the sender. > > > -- Douglas Knudsen http://www.cubicleman.com this is my signature, like it?
