Can you elaborate a bit more on this? This is in no way starting some kind of flame. If you claim that such problems are solved easily, can you please tell us more about it? Since you've apparently used both, some kind of comparison would be EXTREMELY appreciated from my side. How does PureMVC solves modularity, does it introduce strong coupling, does it use flex features (binding, etc), what are drawbacks, how about changing states, reusability?
I know there is a lot of documentation on the site, but I still value the experienced user's opinion most. -----Original Message--- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tomeuchre Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 10:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Managing States and Cairngorm --- In [email protected], "Sebastian Zarzycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm fighting with this as well. I switched from Cairngorm to PureMVC and never looked back. It is so much easier, logical and re-usable, and little things like this never pop up anymore. I'll never go back... -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links
