puremvc works in flex (its an agnostic framework really) but rising to cairngorm's defence, the faults with cairngorm are well documented, puremvc is not as used. puremvc is still a (relatively) new addition, it has its faults, like those 3 singletoooons's i care not for an agnostic framework, i want a framework i like for each enviroment. all this said, puremvc does test better, has cleaner code, but is not an ideal.
On Nov 21, 2007 4:57 PM, Sebastian Zarzycki < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you elaborate a bit more on this? This is in no way starting some > kind > of flame. If you claim that such problems are solved easily, can you > please > tell us more about it? Since you've apparently used both, some kind of > comparison would be EXTREMELY appreciated from my side. How does PureMVC > solves modularity, does it introduce strong coupling, does it use flex > features (binding, etc), what are drawbacks, how about changing states, > reusability? > > I know there is a lot of documentation on the site, but I still value the > experienced user's opinion most. > > > -----Original Message--- > From: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto: > [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On > Behalf Of tomeuchre > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 10:15 PM > To: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Managing States and Cairngorm > > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Sebastian Zarzycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I'm fighting with this as well. > > I switched from Cairngorm to PureMVC and never looked back. It is so > much easier, logical and re-usable, and little things like this never > pop up anymore. > I'll never go back... > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > -- j:pn \\no comment
