I like where that's headed....but can you specify generate a class at
runtime, and specify it's superclass?

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Aaron Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What about making the properties protected and extending the class
down into
> a "reflector" class which is used to spy on it's parents? To get a
true copy
> of the original, couldn't you also access the protected properties
though an
> instance of the parent class? I know you can access the private
properties
> in an instance of the same class, so wouldn't this also be true for the
> protected properties of a parent? Just an idea, haven't really tried
this
> myself.
> 
> Regards,
> ...aaron
> 
> On 11/26/07, Mike Morearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   Gordon's right -- the debugger's techniques can't be used outside of
> > the debugger. Its techniques are completely inaccessible from
> > ActionScript.
> >
> > - Mike Morearty, Adobe Flex Builder team
> >
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>,
"Gordon
> > Smith" <gosmith@> wrote:
> > >
> > > cc'ing Mike to get the lowdown on this. But I'm pretty sure that
> > > whatever the debugger is doing can't be done from ActionScript.
> > >
> > > - Gordon
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:
> > flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > > Behalf Of marty.pitt
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 1:14 PM
> > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Reflection -- Accessing private fields
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Spoil sports. :)
> > >
> > > How does the debugger expose the properties and their values?
Nothing
> > > I can leverage there?
> > >
> > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > , "Gordon Smith" <gosmith@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't believe you can get reflection info about protected or
> > > internal
> > > > APIs either.
> > > >
> > > > Gordon Smith
> > > > Adobe Flex SDK Team
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > ] On
> > > > Behalf Of Alex Harui
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 11:39 AM
> > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:
> > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Reflection -- Accessing private fields
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Private is private.
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:
> > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > ] On
> > > > Behalf Of marty.pitt
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:25 PM
> > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:
> > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Reflection -- Accessing private fields
> > > >
> > > > Hello all.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any way to get the names of private / protected /
internal
> > > > variables within a class at runtime? (ie., actual reflection!)
> > > >
> > > > It seems it's not possible using getClassInfo().
> > > >
> > > > What about some sort of custom serialization? (Remembering
that the
> > > > names of the variables is not known).
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Marty
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Miller
> Chief Technology Officer
> Splash Labs, LLC.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  206-328-5485
> http://www.splashlabs.com
>


Reply via email to