Well no, I don't think you can. But why would you need to? Classes (for the most part) are meant to be static. What is the end all result you're trying to achieve? Will the interface be dynamic as well? Perhaps you could achieve the same goal with dynamic objects and the memento pattern. This is generally the preferred method if you are just trying to save state.
Regards, ...aaron On 11/26/07, marty.pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like where that's headed....but can you specify generate a class at > runtime, and specify it's superclass? > > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Aaron > Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What about making the properties protected and extending the class > down into > > a "reflector" class which is used to spy on it's parents? To get a > true copy > > of the original, couldn't you also access the protected properties > though an > > instance of the parent class? I know you can access the private > properties > > in an instance of the same class, so wouldn't this also be true for the > > protected properties of a parent? Just an idea, haven't really tried > this > > myself. > > > > Regards, > > ...aaron > > > > On 11/26/07, Mike Morearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Gordon's right -- the debugger's techniques can't be used outside of > > > the debugger. Its techniques are completely inaccessible from > > > ActionScript. > > > > > > - Mike Morearty, Adobe Flex Builder team > > > > > > --- In [email protected] > > > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Gordon > > > Smith" <gosmith@> wrote: > > > > > > > > cc'ing Mike to get the lowdown on this. But I'm pretty sure that > > > > whatever the debugger is doing can't be done from ActionScript. > > > > > > > > - Gordon > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto: > > > [email protected] > > > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On > > > > Behalf Of marty.pitt > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 1:14 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Reflection -- Accessing private fields > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Spoil sports. :) > > > > > > > > How does the debugger expose the properties and their values? > Nothing > > > > I can leverage there? > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto: > > > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > , "Gordon Smith" <gosmith@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I don't believe you can get reflection info about protected or > > > > internal > > > > > APIs either. > > > > > > > > > > Gordon Smith > > > > > Adobe Flex SDK Team > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto: > > > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > [mailto:[email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto: > > > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > ] On > > > > > Behalf Of Alex Harui > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 11:39 AM > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto: > > > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Reflection -- Accessing private fields > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Private is private. > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto: > > > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > [mailto:[email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><mailto: > > > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > ] On > > > > > Behalf Of marty.pitt > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:25 PM > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com><flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto: > > > flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Reflection -- Accessing private fields > > > > > > > > > > Hello all. > > > > > > > > > > Is there any way to get the names of private / protected / > internal > > > > > variables within a class at runtime? (ie., actual reflection!) > > > > > > > > > > It seems it's not possible using getClassInfo(). > > > > > > > > > > What about some sort of custom serialization? (Remembering > that the > > > > > names of the variables is not known). > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > Marty > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Aaron Miller > > Chief Technology Officer > > Splash Labs, LLC. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 206-328-5485 > > http://www.splashlabs.com > > > > > -- Aaron Miller Chief Technology Officer Splash Labs, LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 206-328-5485 http://www.splashlabs.com
