Yes I know I think it is way too large as well, but my DB admin doesn't seem to 
care.  He 
wants better performance.  So I am wondering if flex + blazeds should be taking 
50 
seconds to draw this chart or am I doing something wrong?  James Ward's 
benchmark app 
pulls down 20K records in 1.4 sec.  How come my 180K doesn't send and display 
in 10 
sec?


--- In [email protected], li wenzhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 180k records?!!!!
> sounds like a  toooo large dataset to delivery!
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: netdeep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:27:37 PM
> Subject: [flexcoders] blazeds performance
> 
> I am wondering if anyone has an idea about increasing blazeds performance. I 
> am 
receiving 
> information from a database for a chart. Each record is a java object and the 
> entire set 
of 
> aproximately 180K records is contained in two separate arrays since it is a 
> multi-series 
> chart. I convert the records into actionscript objects from java objects when 
> I get them. 
> From the time the records are sent to the flex app, til the time they get 
> drawn on the 
screen 
> takes approximately 45+ seconds. This seems pretty long to me. Is this on par 
> with what 
> should be expected? If not, what could I do to improve this performance?
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>       
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
>



Reply via email to