It seems that when you call the AddchildAt() you put an index that is out of range.
For example: if you have a viewStack with already 2 canvas and is going to add a third one, addchildAt could be used to index it in the 0 And 1 index of the viewStack, if you want it to go to the last you just use Addchild since the index 2 doesn't exists yet. This logic can be used for all the containers. Atenciosamente, Daniel Fernandes Credidio Tecnologia da Informação Grupo Santa Clara - Análise e Desenvolvimento. Rua Santa Clara, 100 - Parque Santa Clara Eusébio - CE - 61760-000 T +5585 4006-5613 [EMAIL PROTECTED] De: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie Enviada em: sexta-feira, 25 de abril de 2008 15:47 Para: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Assunto: RE: [flexcoders] Re: currentState question Hello, I'm still getting the same error, even if I put the currentState before the init method call. Here is the debug output : RangeError: Error #2006: L'index indiqué sort des limites. at flash.display::DisplayObjectContainer/addChildAt() at mx.core::Container/addChildAt()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\Container.as:2206] at mx.states::RemoveChild/remove()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\states\RemoveChild.as:146] at mx.core::UIComponent/removeState()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:7169] at mx.core::UIComponent/commitCurrentState()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:7011] at mx.core::UIComponent/setCurrentState()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:6948] at mx.core::UIComponent/set currentState()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:4260] at ApplicationReception/handFermerSession()[C:\__Projets\__Connect\ApplicationReception\src\ApplicationReception.as:407] at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction() at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent() at mx.rpc::AbstractInvoker/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::dispatchRpcEvent()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AbstractInvoker.as:168] at mx.rpc::AbstractInvoker/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::resultHandler()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AbstractInvoker.as:191] at mx.rpc::Responder/result()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\Responder.as:41] at mx.rpc::AsyncRequest/acknowledge()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AsyncRequest.as:74] at DirectHTTPMessageResponder/completeHandler()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\messaging\channels\DirectHTTPChannel.as:381] at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction() at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent() at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete() Does it gives more infos? Thanks Nicolas De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Tim Hoff Envoyé : 25 avril 2008 14:18 À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Objet : [flexcoders] Re: currentState question Hey Nicolas, It douen't look like you're setting a base (starting) state for the application. This would need to happen before creationComplete (initialize); otherwise the application doesn't know which state to render initially. See if this works: <mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; xmlns:perso="components.*" layout="absolute" currentState="frmLogin" creationComplete="init()"> -TH --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Derrick, > > > > Yes, even if I write : > > > > this.currentState = 'frmLogin'; > > > > I'm getting the same error. > > > > I will explain further my application design. > > > > <mx:Application > > xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; > > xmlns:perso="components.*" > > layout="absolute" > > creationComplete="init()"> > > > > On creationComplete event, it enters the init() method. > > > > public function init():void { > > this.currentState = 'frmLogin'; > > // Removed content // > > } > > > > So, as soon as the application load, it's not in the base state but in > another specified state (here, frmLogin). Is this design can cause the above > problem? > > > > The state switch is called in a callback method of a http service object > which is : > > > > private function handFermerSession(p_objEvent:ResultEvent):void { > > try { > > this.currentState = 'frmLogin'; > > } catch( err:Error ) { > > Alert.show(err.message.toString()); > > } > > } > > > > I hope it's more clear... > > > > Thanks > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] De la > part de Derrick Anderson > Envoyé : 25 avril 2008 13:41 > À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Re: currentState question > > > > i'm with ghus32, if you only have 2 states, why not just use the > currentState = 'statename' ? do you still get an error with that? > > d. > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello guys, > > > > Thank you for your quick reply. I'm still getting the 2006 error even with > your suggestions. > > > > Here is the structure of my states : > > > > - <Base state> > > o frmAppGestion > > o frmLogin (start) > > > > I try to reset the state when I'm in the frmAppGestion state. > > > > But, there is something weird with the state stack. In the state manager, as > you can see, there are 3 states (base, frmAppGestion and frmLogin). > > > > Here is my code : > > > > <mx:states> > > <mx:State name="frmAppGestion"> > > // Removed content // > > </mx:State> > > <mx:State name="frmLogin"> > > // Removed content // > > </mx:State> > > </mx:states> > > > > As you can see, they are only 2 states not 3. Maybe, this is the problem? > > > > Thanks > > > > Nicolas > > > > De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] De la > part de Andrew Wetmore > Envoyé : 25 avril 2008 12:49 > À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Objet : [flexcoders] Re: currentState question > > > > The other possibility is that the problem comes from using double > quotation marks ("") instead of single(''). currentState likes single > quotation marks. > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:flexcoders% 40yahoogroups.com> , > "Dmitri Girski" <mitek17@> wrote: > > > > Bonjour, > > > > I am pretty sure that this error comes as a consequence of changing > > the state. You should check what happens when you change the state - > > probably you trying to access an element which does not exist in the > > base state. > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > <mailto:flexcoders% 40yahoogroups.com> , > "Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie" > > <nicolasboulet@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > When I try to use this VERY easy command : > > > > > > > > > > > > currentState = "" > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm getting this error. > > > > > > > > > > > > Error #2006: L'index indiqu� sort des limites. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any idea why? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Merci et bonne journ�e, > > > > > > > > > > > > Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie, Webmestre/Webmaster > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > L A P R I S E � > > > > > > T�l: 248-8886 poste 288 > > > > > > nicolasboulet@ > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.maisonlaprise.com/ > > > > > > http://www.habitaflex.com/ > > > > > > http://www.lorendo.com/ > > > > > > http://www.tomindustries.com/ > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > >
