Yes, this just shows that you've got a logical problem in your state
design.
And this happens in <mx:AddChild relativeTo="{h1}" />--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I�m still getting the same error, even if I put the currentState before the > init method call. > > > > Here is the debug output : > > > > RangeError: Error #2006: L'index indiqué sort des limites. > > at flash.display::DisplayObjectContainer/addChildAt() > > at > mx.core::Container/addChildAt()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\s > rc\mx\core\Container.as:2206] > > at > mx.states::RemoveChild/remove()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\s > rc\mx\states\RemoveChild.as:146] > > at > mx.core::UIComponent/removeState()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framewor > k\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:7169] > > at > mx.core::UIComponent/commitCurrentState()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\f > ramework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:7011] > > at > mx.core::UIComponent/setCurrentState()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\fram > ework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:6948] > > at mx.core::UIComponent/set > currentState()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComp > onent.as:4260] > > at > ApplicationReception/handFermerSession()[C:\__Projets\__Connect\ApplicationR > eception\src\ApplicationReception.as:407] > > at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction() > > at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent() > > at > mx.rpc::AbstractInvoker/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::dispatch > RpcEvent()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AbstractInvoker.a > s:168] > > at > mx.rpc::AbstractInvoker/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::resultHa > ndler()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AbstractInvoker.as:1 > 91] > > at > mx.rpc::Responder/result()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\R > esponder.as:41] > > at > mx.rpc::AsyncRequest/acknowledge()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\ > mx\rpc\AsyncRequest.as:74] > > at > DirectHTTPMessageResponder/completeHandler()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\project > s\rpc\src\mx\messaging\channels\DirectHTTPChannel.as:381] > > at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction() > > at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent() > > at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete() > > > > > > Does it gives more infos? > > > > Thanks > > > > Nicolas > > > > De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la > part de Tim Hoff > Envoyé : 25 avril 2008 14:18 > À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Objet : [flexcoders] Re: currentState question > > > > Hey Nicolas, > > It douen't look like you're setting a base (starting) state for the > application. This would need to happen before creationComplete > (initialize); otherwise the application doesn't know which state to > render initially. See if this works: > > <mx:Application > xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; > xmlns:perso="components.*" > layout="absolute" > currentState="frmLogin" > creationComplete="init()"> > > -TH > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , > "Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie" > <nicolasboulet@> wrote: > > > > Derrick, > > > > > > > > Yes, even if I write : > > > > > > > > this.currentState = 'frmLogin'; > > > > > > > > I'm getting the same error. > > > > > > > > I will explain further my application design. > > > > > > > > <mx:Application > > > > xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; > > > > xmlns:perso="components.*" > > > > layout="absolute" > > > > creationComplete="init()"> > > > > > > > > On creationComplete event, it enters the init() method. > > > > > > > > public function init():void { > > > > this.currentState = 'frmLogin'; > > > > // Removed content // > > > > } > > > > > > > > So, as soon as the application load, it's not in the base state but > in > > another specified state (here, frmLogin). Is this design can cause > the above > > problem? > > > > > > > > The state switch is called in a callback method of a http service > object > > which is : > > > > > > > > private function handFermerSession(p_objEvent:ResultEvent):void { > > > > try { > > > > this.currentState = 'frmLogin'; > > > > } catch( err:Error ) { > > > > Alert.show(err.message.toString()); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > I hope it's more clear� > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > > > > > De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] > De la > > part de Derrick Anderson > > Envoyé : 25 avril 2008 13:41 > > À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Re: currentState question > > > > > > > > i'm with ghus32, if you only have 2 states, why not just use the > > currentState = 'statename' ? do you still get an error with that? > > > > d. > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie > > <nicolasboulet@> wrote: > > > > Hello guys, > > > > > > > > Thank you for your quick reply. I'm still getting the 2006 error > even with > > your suggestions. > > > > > > > > Here is the structure of my states : > > > > > > > > - <Base state> > > > > o frmAppGestion > > > > o frmLogin (start) > > > > > > > > I try to reset the state when I'm in the frmAppGestion state. > > > > > > > > But, there is something weird with the state stack. In the state > manager, as > > you can see, there are 3 states (base, frmAppGestion and frmLogin). > > > > > > > > Here is my code : > > > > > > > > <mx:states> > > > > <mx:State name="frmAppGestion"> > > > > // Removed content // > > > > </mx:State> > > > > <mx:State name="frmLogin"> > > > > // Removed content // > > > > </mx:State> > > > > </mx:states> > > > > > > > > As you can see, they are only 2 states not 3. Maybe, this is the > problem? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] > De la > > part de Andrew Wetmore > > Envoyé : 25 avril 2008 12:49 > > À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > Objet : [flexcoders] Re: currentState question > > > > > > > > The other possibility is that the problem comes from using double > > quotation marks ("") instead of single(''). currentState likes > single > > quotation marks. > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:flexcoders% > 40yahoogroups.com> , > > "Dmitri Girski" <mitek17@> wrote: > > > > > > Bonjour, > > > > > > I am pretty sure that this error comes as a consequence of > changing > > > the state. You should check what happens when you change the > state - > > > probably you trying to access an element which does not exist in > the > > > base state. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:flexcoders% > 40yahoogroups.com> , > > "Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie" > > > <nicolasboulet@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I try to use this VERY easy command : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > currentState = "" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm getting this error. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Error #2006: L'index indiqu� sort des limites. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any idea why? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Merci et bonne journ�e, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nicolas Boulet-Lavoie, Webmestre/Webmaster > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > L A P R I S E � > > > > > > > > T�l: 248-8886 poste 288 > > > > > > > > nicolasboulet@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.maisonlaprise.com/ > > > > > > > > http://www.habitaflex.com/ > > > > > > > > http://www.lorendo.com/ > > > > > > > > http://www.tomindustries.com/ > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > >
