I got several errors on the server when I tried to add those properties to the 
services and 
messaging config files.  Where are they supposed to go exactly?  My messaging 
channel is 
a ServiceAdapter defined in the messaging-config.xml file as:

<adapter-definition id="TerracottaGateway" class="factory.ReportManager"/>
....
<destination id="factory">
                <adapter ref="TerracottaGateway"/>        
                <channels>
                        <channel ref="my-polling-amf"/>
            <channel ref="my-streaming-amf"/>
        </channels>     
        </destination>

I have defined setters and get methods for classes.  I even used cut and paste 
to make 
sure the actionscript and java names are identical for all of the variables and 
methods.  
Yet I still don't get java to recognize the Axis class.  It has about 12 
variables.  Most of the 
variables are Strings and ints, but one is an ArrayList (ArrayCollection in 
Actionscript).  
However this conversion seems to work fine in my Chart class.  Curiously my 
chart class 
maps fine from java to actionscript, even though I have no setter methods in 
it, only get 
methods.  I have only two variables there: a String, and an ArrayList.




--- In [email protected], "Seth Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Make sure your classes adhere to AMF serialization rules. You need public 
> get/set 
accessors for each property.
> 
> You can also use either of the following config settings for your 
> <channel-definition> 
on the server to further debug any problems with de/serializing your custom 
types.
> <channel-definition ...>
>    ...
>    <properties>
>       <serialization>
>           <ignore-property-errors>false</ignore-property-errors>
>           <log-property-errors>true</log-property-errors>
>       </serialization>
> 
> You could use either (or both); when ignore-property-errors is false, an 
> exception is 
thrown when a property can't be handled rather than just being ignored (the 
historic 
default to match player behavior). 
> 
> When log-property-errors is true, you'll get a warning logged on the server 
> when a 
property is ignored. If you enable this, add Endpoint.* to your log category 
filters to see 
these.
> 
> Seth
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
netdeep
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 12:07 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Sending data to the Server
> 
> Thanks for the reply Seth.
> 
> I am now able to send an ArrayCollection of my custom class Chart:
> 
> [Bindable]
> [RemoteClass(alias="factory.data.Chart")]
> public class ChartObject
> {
> private var name:String;
> private var axisList:ArrayCollection;
> 
> public function getAxisList():ArrayCollection {
> return axisList;
> }
> }
> 
> And I can read the array in the java message handler, and it even detects the 
> objects in 
> the array as Charts but when I try to get the axisList array from within 
> Chart, it comes 
up 
> as null. The axisList is an array of objects from another custom class I have 
> called Axis. 
> Here is a sample of the java Chart class for reference:
> 
> public class Chart {
> 
> //import mx.collections.ArrayCollection;
> //import mx.controls.Image;
> 
> public String name;
> public ArrayList axisList;
> 
> public ArrayList getAxisList() {
> return axisList;
> }
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Seth Hodgson" <shodgson@> wrote:
> >
> > You can send any type of data as the body of a message. If you want to send 
> > an 
instance 
> of a typed class, be sure to include [RemoteClass(alias="your.java.Class")] 
> metadata in 
> your ActionScript class so that the Player serializes it with type info and 
> the server can 
> deserialize it to your desired type.
> > 
> > Seth
> > 
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
Of 
> netdeep
> > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 7:21 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Sending data to the Server
> > 
> > I need to send data to the server. Up til now I've been using messaging. 
> > But as far as I 
> can 
> > tell, I can only send strings this way.
> > 
> > What other alternatives are there? For instance, I would like to be able to 
> > send an array 
> or a 
> > custom data structure. I'm using Java for the backend. Ideally I would not 
> > want to 
launch 
> a 
> > new RemoteObject for each send from Flex, but instead have a persistent 
> > listener to 
> hear all 
> > requests (which is why I initially chose messaging and created a channel 
> > for the java 
> message 
> > manager to listen to).
> >
>



Reply via email to