If it's not giving away any business secrets, why on earth would you want to subclass Dictionary? Flex already has some sort of built in support for singletons, I believe.
-J On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Mayur Bais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any specific reason why we should not extend dictionary..? > I got it working by writing one getter method in the class which returned > dictionary... > just curious........ > > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Don't extend dictionary, just return a Dictionary. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On >> Behalf Of *Mayur Bais >> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:11 AM >> *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >> *Subject:* [flexcoders] error while extending dictionary error .. >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> I have class extending a dictionary class: >> >> public class mydict extends Dictionary >> { >> public static instance:mydict // done to maintain singleton class >> function mydict (){ >> super(); >> } >> >> public static funtion getInstance():mydict { >> return instance; >> } >> >> function addTodict(id:int,val:String):void{ >> mydict [id] = val // its giving me error here...can not create >> proeprty 26..(if id was 26..) on mydict >> } >> } >> >> >> >> Any work around?? >> >> Regards >> Mayur >> >> > > -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
