Josh, I couldn't disagree more. If you wrote a component that saves me time and/or money, or provides value to my users, it'd be silly, and a waste of time and money, for me to go and develop it myself. Since you saved me time and/or money, you also deserve to be fairly compensated, if you want to receive $$ for your work.
I don't have the resources to go after anyone who might de-compile the code, especially internationally. That's just lost money. JF --- In [email protected], "Josh McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *sigh* > > Release it, maybe you'll sell some, maybe many amateurs who would never pay > will pirate it, maybe one or two professionals will pirate it. > > Don't release it, your hard work can stay safe, and you'll never sell a > copy. > > Personally, if it doesn't summon Jesus I think you'll need some luck selling > a component without source. This is why we have lawyers and contracts. > > -J > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Michel Scoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I mostly used it for Flash SWF files, and it work wonders as far as I > > know. At least, no incompatibility problem and/or decompilers being able to > > show/see the code. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *De:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Em > > nome de *jmfillman > > *Enviada em:* segunda-feira, 2 de junho de 2008 17:59 > > *Para:* [email protected] > > *Assunto:* [flexcoders] SWC Encrypt 2.0 - Does it work? > > > > > > > > Has anyone had experience using SWC Encrypt 2.0, by Amayeta? Does it > > work, or would I just be wasting my money? I'm trying to protect a > > component I plan to sell, but given the prevalence of de- compilers, I'm > > hesitant to release it. I don't want to see all my hard work stolen. > > > > > > > > > > -- > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
