I don't think you can do field.subField but you could use labelFunctions to accomplish essentially the same thing. Heck, you might even be able to set dataField = "field.subField" and then use a generic labelFunction that does something like return data[column.dataField]. Just a guess on that part but labelFunction is definitely the core of what you'll need.
HTH, Ben --- In [email protected], "Josh McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey guys, > Is there a well-used trick to reference "field.subField" rather than just > "field" when setting up datagrid columns? I'd rather not have to flatten my > DTOs or add a bunch of redundant get functions if possible - the DTO is > bindable and the fields are just public vars. > > Cheers, > -Josh > > -- > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
