Damn of course. A smart labelFunction that uses labelField. I like it. Should be reusable too. I'll post it here in a couple hours, working on something else right now :) -Josh
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:50 PM, ben.clinkinbeard < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think you can do field.subField but you could use > labelFunctions to accomplish essentially the same thing. Heck, you > might even be able to set dataField = "field.subField" and then use a > generic labelFunction that does something like return > data[column.dataField]. Just a guess on that part but labelFunction is > definitely the core of what you'll need. > > HTH, > Ben > > --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Josh > McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hey guys, > > Is there a well-used trick to reference "field.subField" rather than > just > > "field" when setting up datagrid columns? I'd rather not have to > flatten my > > DTOs or add a bunch of redundant get functions if possible - the DTO is > > bindable and the fields are just public vars. > > > > Cheers, > > -Josh > > > > -- > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for > thee." > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
