I hear you João, Binding to the model works the majority of the time. However, it can also add a significant amount of model variables, that are used stricly for state, that can be eliminated with view call-backs. It's clearly an issue of preference, but I personally like what the guys at UM have done to add a little more flexibily to the architecture.
-TH --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, João Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim, > > I don't use UM extensions and I'm totally able to notify my views just > with Cairngorm. > What I use usually is a model ( no matter what it is ) that I inject to > my event , passes to the command and then on result/fault I update the > same model. Since the model passes by reference, my view, which is > listening (binding) to that model, can react to the 'notification'. > -- > > João Fernandes > > http://www.onflexwithcf.org > http://www.riapt.org > Portugal Adobe User Group (http://aug.riapt.org) >