Hey Barry, My comments, concerning Cairngorm from the beginning, is that there needed to be a more robust method of informing the view that a gesture head succeded or failed. Probably my ignorance, and I'm totally open to suggestion, but the UM extensions seeemed to solve the initial Cairngorm; that in my practice came to light. I welcome your sugestione for a more universal persprective.
-TH --- In [email protected], "barry.beattie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > They certainly deserve consideration to be > > rolled into Cairngorm proper. > > hmmm, on listening to that podcast a while ago, I got the distinct > impression that there was a - not a disagreement as such - but > certainly a difference in viewpoint, especially for the reasons that > UM went to the effort of developing it. > > I mean, Tom put forward a very articulate and persuasive case but > should the extensions be part of the core or remain add-ins for people > to decide for themselves? >
