Heh :) I don't think there was anything at all wrong with your response mate, although the "generated" directory can be a scary place, there's a *lot* of actionscript classes that go into making a Flex swf do its thing.
I do apologise if I come off as a jerk, but I can't apologise for the occasional curse word. I'm one of those types who don't really believe in "freedom from being offended". I didn't punch anybody's mum, or sleep with their sister or anything ;-) -Josh On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Rick Winscot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josh – I second Jeff's comment and have to apologize if my response was > sour. What I was trying to say is that, given your example, I would think > that the path was clear for the poster to 'have at it.' It isn't necessary > to understand (to perfection) how binding works to use it… or to begin > experimenting with behavior/performance to find a best practice. Is there a > definitive/single way to implement binding? No. Can one implementation > perform better than another? Of course! Where should the original poster > begin their search for ultimate truth? Your suggestion is worthy of a > cut-and-paste starting point – and as you say… the deeper understanding will > happen with time and perhaps after you bleed at the keyboard for hours on > end. > > > > Rick Winscot > > > -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
